Franchise Vs Non Franchise

franchise vs non franchise

CUSTOMER PROFILE & BEHAVIORAL ANALYSIS

CUSTOMER PROFILE & BEHAVIORAL ANALYSIS

A STUDY AT SPENCER’S DAILY

 

* K.Logeshwari

** V.Ramadevi

ABSTRACT

India is being seen as a potential goldmine for retail investors from over the world and latest research has rated India as the top destination for retailers for an attractive emerging retail market. India’s vast middle class and its almost untapped retail industry are key attractions for global retail giants wanting to enter newer markets. Even though India has well over 5 million retail outlets, the country sorely lacks anything that can resemble a retailing industry in the modern sense of the term. This scenario has led to a transition from unorganized retailing to organized retailing. There exists a severe competition among the organized retailers to attract the customers. The study reveals that the top five factors that are expected by the consumers are price, quality, shelf arrangements, brand choice and availability of the products. The variables brand choice, availability, discounts, packing facilities and customer care meet the satisfaction level of the consumers of Spencer’s Daily. The findings would enable the marketing strategists to frame suitable strategies enhance the share of Spencer’s Daily in the retailing industry.

 

 

 

 

 

 

——————————————–

* Lecturer, Department of management studies and Research, Karpagam University  , Coimbatore – 641021 ,Tamilnadu

* * Lecturer, Department of management studies and Research, Karpagam University  , Coimbatore – 641021, Tamilnadu

 

 

 

 

INTRODUCTION

 

The India Retail Industry is the largest among all the industries, accounting for over 10 percent of the country’s GDP and around 8 percent of the employment. The Retail Industry in India has come forth as one of the most dynamic and fast paced industries with several players entering the market. But all of them have yet tasted success because of the heavy initial investments that are required to break even with its way towards becoming the next boom industry. Against this background the study was conducted to understand the profile and buying behavior of the consumers of Spencer’s daily.

 

 

Further the study attempts to identify the influence of demographic variables on the level of expectation and satisfaction and also highlights the gap between the expectation and satisfaction level. It also analyses the key factors that influence the shopping and aims to understand the level of expectation and satisfaction The study assumes the characteristic of descriptive research. A sample of hundred and twenty five customers in Coimbatore city is selected on convenience basis and data are collected through specially questionnaire.

 

            The total concept and idea of shopping has undergone an attention drawing change in terms of format and consumer buying behavior, ushering in a revolution in shopping in India. Modern retailing has entered into the Retail market in India as is observed in the form of bustling shopping centers, multi-storied malls and the huge complexes that offer shopping, entertainment and food all under one roof.

 

            A large young working population with median age of 24 years, nuclear families in urban areas, along with increasing working women population and emerging opportunities in the services sector are going to be the key factors in the growth of the organized sector in India.

 

            In India the vast middle class and its almost untapped retail industry are the key attractive forces for global retail giants wanting to enter into newer markets, which in turn will help the India Retail Industry to grow faster. Indian retail is expected to grow 25 per cent annually. Modern retail in India could be worth US$ 175-200 billion by 2016. The Food Retail Industry in India dominates the shopping basket. The Mobile phone Retail Industry in India is already a US$ 16.7 billion business, growing at over 20 per cent per year. The future of the India Retail Industry looks promising with the growing of the market, with the government policies becoming more favorable and the emerging technologies facilitating operations.

 

The study mainly deals with the customer’s perception towards Spencer’s daily which is a retail store. Retailing is one of the important factors in buying and selling of the products. There are different types of retail outlet through which the store can have very intimate relationship with transactions made on a face-to-face, first name basis. At the other end of the scale, goods may be retailed across the globe, with no physical contact being made at all. The different types of retail stores are as follows,

  • Department store
  • Door-to-door retailing
  • Distance retailing
  • Chain retailing
  • Party retailing
  • Single independent non-franchised store
  • Super market
  • Van retailing
  • Ware house club

 

Until the introduction of the self service stores, the customers were buying goods by simply asking the shopkeeper for their goods. There was a personal one-to-one relationship between the customer and the shop keeper.The first self service store was started in the year 1915 by Albert Gerard in Los Angeles. In these stores the groceries were stacked on shelves allowing the customers to walk around and browse, collecting their requirements by themselves and the shop keeper would only need to calculate the final bill at the end of the process and receive payment.

 

            This new type of shopping was more efficient and many customers preferred it. There has been a steady rise in the global amount of self service stores ever since it started. Even though India has well over 5 million retail outlets of all sizes and styles, the country sorely lacks anything that can resemble a retailing industry in the modern sense of the term. This presents international retailing specialists with the great opportunity. Retailing in India is thoroughly unorganized. There is no supply chain management perspective.

 

            According to a survey by AT Kearney, an overwhelming proportion of the Rs.400000 crore retail markets are unorganized. In fact, only a Rs.20000 crore segment of the market is organized. Just over 8 per cent of India’s population is engaged in retailing. The first challenge facing the organized retail industry in India is competition from the unorganized sector. Traditional retailing has established in India for some centuries. It is a low cost structure mostly own operated and it runs for generations.

 

            In contrast, players in the organized sector have big expenses to meet and yet have to keep prices to low enough to be able to compete with the traditional sector. High cost for the organized sector arises from higher labour cost, social security to employees, high quality and other comfort facilities.

 

            These drawbacks present opportunity to International and/or professionally managed Indian Corporations to pioneer a modern retailing industry in India and benefit from it.

Statement of the problem:

Indian retail sector is undergoing a buoyant transition from unorganized to organized retailing. This has given raise to severe competition among the organized retail sector. Understanding the customers in terms of their profile, buying behavior, expectation and satisfaction is important. This is identified as the problem area and the study has attempted to address the above said issues with respect to Spencer’s Daily.

 

Objectives:

n      To understand the Profile & Buying behavior of Spencer’s Daily consumers.

n      To analyze the key factors influencing shopping at Spencer’s Daily.

n      To understand the level of expectation and satisfaction of Spencer’s Daily consumers.

n      To study the influence of Demographic variables on expectation and satisfaction level.

n      To analyze the gap between the level of expectation and satisfaction

Scope of the study:

          This research gives a broad frame work of the Spencer’s daily customers and an analysis of their profile and buying behavior. This can be used as a guideline in the future business plans and making changes in the current activities. It gives an idea of the areas, which need emphasis and development.

            This study has been conducted in Coimbatore city covering all the areas falling within the Coimbatore zone with a sample size of 125 respondents. All classes of customers were met and their views were analyzed.

 

 Methodology:

a)      Type of Study:

                The type of the study is descriptive in nature since it describes the perception of the customer’s on Spencer’s daily.

 

b)      Sampling Design:

                  The sampling design consists of sampling method and sample size. The sampling method used is convenient method of sampling since the population is infinite. The sample size is 125 respondents from the customers of Spencer’s daily in the Coimbatore city.

       

 

 c) Method of Data Collection:

                  The method used to collect primary data is through questionnaires. Secondary data is collected through company manuals, records, magazines and web sites.

d) Tools for Analysis:

      The statistical tools used for analysis are     

  • Percentage analysis
  • Chi – square analysis
  • Mean score analysis
  • Paired sample ‘t’ test

Percentage analysis:

                 Percentage analysis is used to describe the profile of respondents and buying behavior of the customers of Spencer’s Daily.

Chi –square analysis:

                  Chi – square analysis is used when two variables are to be compared. In this study, chi-square analysis is used to make a comparison between the level of expectation and satisfaction of customers of Spencer’s daily.

Mean score analysis:

In this study mean value is used to identify and rank the factors which influence the level of expectation and satisfaction of the consumers.

Paired sample‘t’ test:

This test is used to find out the significant difference between the two variables. In this study t-test is performed to find the gap between the level of expectation and satisfaction.

 

 

 

 

 

Mean score analysis on the level of expectation and satisfaction of the respondents on various factors

 Level of expectation `

Table 1 – The ranking of the Expectation factors

Factors

Percentage

MEANSCORE

 

 

SCORE

RANKS

VI

I

N

LI

NI

Price

44

81

0

0

0

1.26

1

Quality

54

71

0

0

0

1.52

2

Location

29

74

22

0

0

1.944

13

Brand image

41

72

12

0

0

1.768

9

Brand choice

54

70

0

1

0

1.584

4

Availability

49

76

0

0

0

1.608

5

Shelf arrangements

55

70

0

0

0

1.56

3

Crowd management

51

68

5

1

0

1.648

6

Assistance provided

26

71

28

0

0

2.016

14

Customer care

54

41

28

2

0

1.824

11

Ambience

41

71

8

0

0

1.696

7

Discounts

60

40

25

0

0

1.72

8

Billing

49

39

36

1

0

1.912

12

Packing facilities

50

48

27

0

0

1.816

10

Parking facilities

36

59

22

44

0

2.048

15

VI – Very much important,  I – Important,        N – Neutral, LI – Less Important,          

NI – Not Important

 

From the above table, it can be inferred that the price factor is felt very important by the respondents, the next factors as the order is quality, shelf arrangements, brand choice, availability, crowd management, ambience, discounts, brand image, packing facilities, customer care, billing ,location assistance provided and parking facilities.

 Level of satisfaction

Table 2 – The ranking of the Satisfaction factors

Factors

Percentage

MEANSCORE

 

 

SCORE

RANKS

VMS

S

N

D

VDS

Price

11

78

35

1

0

1.26

1

Quality

24

64

36

1

0

1.52

2

Location

25

59

32

9

0

1.944

13

Brand image

29

62

29

5

0

1.768

9

Brand choice

51

70

4

0

0

1.584

4

Availability

54

55

16

0

0

1.608

5

Shelf arrangements

32

71

22

0

0

1.56

3

Crowd management

28

77

19

1

0

1.648

6

Assistance provided

43

46

36

0

0

2.016

14

Customer care

45

54

26

0

0

1.824

11

Ambience

28

58

38

1

0

1.696

7

Discounts

57

48

20

0

0

1.72

8

Billing

28

63

33

1

0

1.912

12

Packing facilities

51

52

22

0

0

1.816

10

Parking facilities

7

16

30

39

33

2.048

15

VMS-Very much satisfied, S- Satisfied, N- Neutral, D- Dissatisfied, VDS- Very much satisfied.

From the above table, it can be inferred that Brand choice is the factor which is felt very much satisfied by the respondents, the next factors as the order is availability, discounts, packing facilities, customer care,  arrangements, assistance provided, crowd management, brand image, billing, ambience, quality, location, price and parking facilities.

 

Gap analysis between the Level of Expectation and Satisfaction

            To study the gap between expectation and satisfaction Paired Sample t- test is used. For this purpose the following hypothesis is formulated.

Ho: There is no significant gap between the expectation and satisfaction regarding the various factors.

The above hypothesis is subjected using paired sample t-test and the findings are summarized below.

Table3- Gap analysis: Expectation Vs Satisfaction

Factors

T value

P value

Significance

Price

15.561

.000

S

Quality

           7.761

.000

S

Location

2.988

.003

S

Brand image

3.345

.001

S

Brand choice

.649

.517

NS

Availability

           1.210

.229

NS

Shelf arrangements

5.182

.000

S

Crowd management

3.927

.000

S

Assistance provided

             .797

.427

S

Customer care

.248

.804

NS

Ambience

5.136

.000

S

Discounts

.171

.865

NS

Billing

1.518

.131

S

Packing facilities

.492

.624

NS

Parking facilities

11.654

.000

S

 

S-Significant; NS- Not significant;

From the above table it can be seen that there is significant gap between the level of expectation and satisfaction with respect to price, quality, location, brand image,

Shelf arrangements, crowd management, assistance provided, ambience, billing and parking facilities.

Further it can be seen that there is no significant gap between brand choices, availability,

Customer care, discounts and packing facilities.

Chart 1 – Expectation Vs Satisfaction

 

 

 Influence of demographic variables on Expectation.

            In order to understand the influence of demographic variables on the level of expectation, the chi-square test is performed at 5% significant level. The demographic variables selected are age, gender, education, occupation and income level the findings are presented below.

H0:  Age does not have a significant influence on the level of expectation. The above hypothesis is tested and the findings are presented below.

Table 4- Influence of the Age on the expectation factors

Factors

sss

Age  

 

X 2

P value

Price

.354

.950

Quality

            2.594

         .458

 

Location

3.313

.769

Brand image

           3.851

.697

Brand choice

4.088

.665

Availability

           5.243

.155

Shelf arrangements

1.167

.761

Crowd management

            7.774

.557

Assistance provided

           10.236

.115

   Customer care

 9.933

.356

Ambience

15.370

.018

Discounts

2.764

.838

Billing

8.352

.499

Packing facilities

13.306

.038

Parking facilities

8.352

.582

From above table it can be seen that the demographic variable age does not have a significant influence on the expectation factors.

H0:  Gender does not have a significant influence on the level of expectation. The above hypothesis is tested and the findings are presented below.

Table 5- Influence of the Gender on the expectation factors

Factors

Gender   

 

X 2

P value

Price

226.402

.000

Quality

225.332

.000

Location

225.971

.000

Brand image

226.107

.000

Brand choice

224.047

.000

Availability

223.241

.000

Shelf arrangements

225.614

.000

Crowd management

225.237

.000

Assistance provided

223.940

.000

Customer care

232.762

.000

Ambience

224.208

.000

Discounts

226.288

.000

Billing

226.606

.000

Packing facilities

229.536

.000

Parking facilities

224.512

.000

From above table it can be seen that the demographic variable gender has a significant influence on all the expectation factors.

 

 

 

 

H0:  Educational Qualification does not have a significant influence on the level of expectation. The above hypothesis is tested and the findings are presented below.

Table 6- Influence of the Educational qualification on the expectation factors

Factors

Educational Qualification    

 

X 2

P value

Price

40.328

.000

Quality

0.200

.655

Location

38.224

.000

Brand image

43.216

.000

Brand choice

62.608

.000

Availability

5.832

.016

Shelf arrangements

1.800

.180

Crowd management

107.032

.000

Assistance provided

31.024

.000

Customer care

47.320

.000

Ambience

48.304

.000

Discounts

14.800

.000

Billing

42.008

.020

Packing facilities

7.792

.000

Parking facilities

86.720

.000

 

From above table it can be seen that the demographic variable educational qualification has a significant influence on the expectation factors price, location, brand image, brand choice, crowd management, assistance provided, and customer care, and ambience, discounts, packing facilities and parking facilities.

 

 

H0: Occupation does not have a significant influence on the level of expectation. The above hypothesis is tested and the findings are presented below.

Table 7- Influence of the Occupation on the expectation factors

Factors

Occupation     

 

X 2

P value

Price

223.911

.000

Quality

237.582

.000

Location

232.485

.000

Brand image

237.168

.000

Brand choice

229.844

.000

Availability

232.374

.000

Shelf arrangements

233.561

.000

Crowd management

242.965

.000

Assistance provided

254.669

.000

Customer care

237.965

.000

Ambience

250.236

.000

Discounts

242.312

.000

Billing

233.348

.000

Packing facilities

242.245

.000

Parking facilities

242.148

.000

From above table it can be seen that the demographic variable occupation has a significant influence on all the expectation factors.

 

 

 

H0:  Income does not have a significant influence on the level of expectation. The above hypothesis is tested and the findings are presented below.

Table 8 – Influence of the Monthly income on the expectation factors

Factors

Monthly income

 

X 2

P value

Price

2.619

.454

Quality

4.042

.257

Location

8.797

.185

Brand image

2.651

.851

Brand choice

1.745

.942

Availability

1.290

.732

Shelf arrangements

1.651

.648

Crowd management

22.573

.007

Assistance provided

5.786

.448

Customer care

6.488

.690

Ambience

2.428

.876

Discounts

5.806

.445

Billing

8.839

.452

Packing facilities

6.228

.398

Parking facilities

17.873

.120

From above table it can be seen that the demographic variable monthly income does not significant influence on all the expectation factors.

 

 

 

 

 

 Influence of demographic variables on Satisfaction Factors.

            In order to understand the influence of demographic variables on the level of  satisfaction, the chi-square test is performed at 5% significant level the demographic variables selected are age, gender, education, occupation and income level the findings are presented below.

H0: Age does not have a significant influence on the level of satisfaction. The above hypothesis is tested and the findings are presented below.

Table 9- Influence of the Age on the satisfaction factors

Factors

sss

Age  

 

X 2

P value

Price

4.745

0.856

Quality

3.778

0.925

Location

7.208

0.615

Brand image

8.985

0.439

Brand choice

8.096

0.231

Availability

13.220

0.040

Shelf arrangements

5.474

0.485

Crowd management

7.428

0.593

Assistance provided

9.654

0.140

Customer care

2.935

0.817

Ambience

6.799

0.658

Discounts

4.960

0.549

Billing

7.004

0.637

Packing facilities

4.546

0.603

Parking facilities

11.314

0.502

From above table it can be seen that the demographic variable age does not have a significant influence on the level of satisfaction.

H0:  Gender does not have a significant influence on the satisfaction factors. The above hypothesis is tested and the findings are presented below.

Table 10- Influence of the Gender on the satisfaction factors

Factors

sss

Gender   

 

X 2

P value

Price

227.153

.000

Quality

224.524

.000

Location

226.014

.000

Brand image

233.537

.000

Brand choice

227.390

.000

Availability

228.355

.000

Shelf arrangements

223.513

.000

Crowd management

229.262

.000

Assistance provided

227.303

.000

Customer care

225.804

.000

Ambience

225.329

.000

Discounts

223.741

.000

Billing

222.393

.000

Packing facilities

224.870

.000

Parking facilities

240.827

.000

From above table it can be seen that the demographic variable gender has a significant influence on all the satisfaction factors.

 

 

 

 

H0:  Educational qualification does not have a significant influence on the satisfaction factors. The above hypothesis is tested and the findings are presented below.

Table 11 – Influence of the Educational qualification on the satisfaction factors

Factors

sss

Educational qualification    

 

X 2

P value

Price

238.949

.000

Quality

233.323

.000

Location

232.164

.000

Brand image

248.992

.000

Brand choice

224.988

.000

Availability

236.773

.000

Shelf arrangements

234.54

.000

Crowd management

232.934

.000

Assistance provided

233.699

.000

Customer care

240.444

.000

Ambience

239.449

.000

Discounts

231.286

.000

Billing

233.251

.000

Packing facilities

229.861

.000

Parking facilities

236.500

.000

From above table it can be seen that the demographic variable educational qualification has a significant influence on all the satisfaction factors.

 

 

 

 

H0:  Occupation does not have a significant influence on the satisfaction factors. The above hypothesis is tested and the findings are presented below.

Table 12- Influence of the Occupation on the satisfaction factors

Factors

sss

Occupation    

 

X 2

P value

Price

243.527

.000

Quality

247.872

.000

Location

237.861

.000

Brand image

254.694

.000

Brand choice

227.260

.000

Availability

248.990

.000

Shelf arrangements

234.207

.000

Crowd management

243.625

.000

Assistance provided

232.494

.000

Customer care

238.576

.000

Ambience

244.765

.000

Discounts

230.430

.000

Billing

241.540

.000

Packing facilities

234.957

.000

Parking facilities

248.510

.000

From above table it can be seen that the demographic variable occupation has a significant influence on all the satisfaction factors.

 

 

 

H0:  Monthly income does not have a significant influence on the satisfaction factors. The above hypothesis is tested and the findings are presented below.

Table 13 – Influence of the Monthly income on the satisfaction factors

Factors

sss

Monthly income    

 

X 2

P value

Price

27.867

.001

Quality

7.798

.555

Location

4.999

.834

Brand image

8.387

.496

Brand choice

10.054

.122

Availability

2.505

.868

Shelf arrangements

1.845

.933

Crowd management

9.253

.414

Assistance provided

6.443

.375

Customer care

7.987

.239

Ambience

6.093

.731

Discounts

5.209

.517

Billing

7.673

.567

Packing facilities

1.768

.940

Parking facilities

4.835

.963

From above table it can be seen that the demographic variable monthly income has a significant influence on the level of satisfaction regarding price. In all others the hypothesis is rejected.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CONCLUSION

 

            Profile of the respondents

  • Most of the respondents belong to the age group of 31 – 40, (i.e. 44%), 27.2% of the respondents are between the age group of 20-30,23.2% of the respondents belong to the age group of  above 40,and 5.6% of the respondents belong to the age category of less than 20.
  • Majority (63.2%) of the respondents is female and 36.8 % are male.
  • Majority (30.4%) of the respondents are home makers.27.2% of the respondents are employed,22.4% of the respondents belong to the professional category, the percentage of business people is 13.6% and students 6.4%
  • Majorities (56.8%) of the respondents are graduates, 32.8% are post graduates, and 8.8% of the respondents are people of school level education.
  • Majority (45.6%) of the respondents have income level between Rs.10001-20000,42.4% of the respondents have income level between Rs.20001-30000,4% of the respondents have an income level above Rs.30000 and 1.6% of the respondents have an income level below 10000.

Buying Behavior of the Consumers

  • Majority (69.6%) of the respondents have come to know Spencer’s through friends & relatives, 16% through advertisements, and 13.6% through magazines & newspapers.
  • Majority (47.2%) of the respondents visit the store between 15 – 30 days, 35.2% of the respondents between 31 – 45 days, 9.6 % above 45 days and 8%, once in 15 days.
  • Majority of the respondents (47.2%) spend between Rs.1001 – 3000, 35.2% of the respondents spend between Rs.3001 – 4000, 9.6% of the respondents spend above Rs.4000 and 8% of the respondents spend less than 1000.
  • Majority (45.6%) of the respondents feel that Kannan departmental store is a close competitor of Spencer’s, 32% of them feel Nilgiris as the close competitor, and 20 % of them feel big bazaar as the close competitor.
  • Majority (45.6%) of the respondents feel that Kannan departmental store is a close competitor of Spencer’s, 32% of them feel Nilgiris as the close competitor, and 20 % of them feel big bazaar as the close competitor.

 Level of expectation and satisfaction

  • The price factor is felt very important by the respondents, the next factors as the order is quality, shelf arrangements, brand choice, availability, crowd management, ambience, discounts, brand image, packing facilities, customer care, billing ,location assistance provided and parking facilities.
  •  Brand choice is the factor which is felt very much satisfied by the respondents, followed by availability, discounts, packing facilities, customer care,  arrangements, assistance provided, crowd management, brand image, billing, ambience, quality, location, price and parking facilities.

 Level of Expectation Vs Satisfaction: Gap analysis

  • There is significant gap between the level of expectation and satisfaction with respect to price, quality, location, brand image, Shelf arrangements, crowd management, assistance provided, and ambience, billing and parking facilities.

            Further it can be seen that there is no significant gap between brand choices,

             availability, Customer care, discounts and packing facilities.

 

 Influence of demographic variables on the level of expectation

  • The variables gender, educational qualification, and occupation have a significant influence over the level of expectation and the variables age and monthly income does not have an influence on the level of expectation.

 

 

 Influence of demographic variables on the level of satisfaction

  • The variables gender, educational qualification, occupation have a significant influence over the level of satisfaction and the variables age and monthly income does not have an influence on the level of satisfaction.

 

 Recommendations

            The recommendations given to the organization are as follows

  • From the profile of the consumers, it can be seen that most of the respondents belong to 31-40 and earn an income of 10001-20000; Spencer’s daily can develop new marketing strategies to concentrate on the other age group and income group of people.
  • Findings show that most of the respondents purchase groceries, and other products need to be properly positioned to attract more consumers.
  • The important factors highlighted by the customers are the price, quality, shelf arrangements, brand choice, availability, crowd management, ambience, discounts, brand image, packing facilities, customer care, billing ,location, assistance provided and parking facilities, these aspects should be given priority to formulate the strategy.
  • The factors of satisfaction such as parking facilities, price, location etc are felt less satisfied or neutral by the consumers, due care should be taken in upgrading those factors in order to retain the consumers.
  • Efforts should be taken to reduce the gap between expectation and satisfaction level in case of factors like price, quality, location, brand image etc. This will lead

to arrest the customer attrition.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Conclusion

 

          The Retail market in India is highly competitive due to increase in the number of consumers belonging to middle and higher income class, change in consumption pattern and opening up of economy due to liberalization, privatization and globalization. Against this background the study is attempted to analyze the profile and buying behavior of the consumers and the factors influencing the level of expectation and satisfaction level of the consumers. The findings would enable the organization to frame suitable strategies and enhance the market share.

 

Books referred:

 

 

  1. Kothari, C. R. (1990). ‘Research Methodology Methods and Techniques’, Wishawa Publishers; Second edition.

 

  1. Philip Kotler and Kevin Lane Keller (2006). ‘Marketing Management’ , Prentice Hall of India Pvt Ltd, Twelfth edition

 

  1.  Stephen Robbins, (1996). ‘ Organizational Behaviors’ Prentice Hall of India Pvt Ltd., Third edition

 

  1. Dr. D. D. Sharma (2005). ‘Marketing Research’ , Sultan Chand & Sons, Third edition

Websites referred:

 

            www.google.com

            web.ebscohost.com

            www.spencersretail.com

            www.fibre2fashion.com

            www.rpgretail.com

            www.retailing.com

            www.market.com

About the Author

Oxi Fresh Earth Friendly Carpet Cleaning Franchise